Hillary Clinton's Left-wing Slip Showing
Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential poll numbers continue to slip with the
Democratic Party's left wing base - according to the latest online survey conducted by the Daily Kos web site.
The former first lady has now slid to fifth place among likely candidates,
with Virginia Gov. Mark Warner leapfrogging past her into third place. She now ranks just above the Koz category "No Freakin'
Clue" among top Democrats who are expected to run.
In more bad news for Mrs. Clinton, her meager 6 percent support continues
a downward trend that began over the summer, when she had 10 percent backing her candidacy.
By September, however, she had slipped to 8 percent in the same poll.
Former Gen. Wesley continues to lead in the Kos poll, winning the backing
of 26 percent. Sen. Russ Feingold trails in second place, with 19 percent support. Former vice presidential candidate John
Edwards comes in fourth, with 12 percent support.
The only first tier presidential candidate who trails Mrs. Clinton is John
Kerry, with just 2 percent backing in the online poll.
Notes Kos, whose site is among the most heavily trafficked on the
political left: "While this isn't a scientific poll of the Democratic Party rank and file, at 11K+ results it's a pretty darn
accurate poll of the sentiments of the Daily Kos community."
--------------------------
Democrats Speak Out on WMD
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/23/133706.shtml
Perhaps Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) should have done some research before charging
the Bush administration with "manufacturing” and "manipulating” pre-war intelligence relating to Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction programs.
In particular, Reid should have researched statements made by several prominent
members of his own Democratic Party.
Republicans have circulated numerous pre-war Democratic statements on weapons of
mass destruction since Reid blurred the line between the claims of the Democratic Party and the slanders of Michael Moore.
Reid on Nov. 1 invoked Rule 21, accusing the Bush administration of purposely misleading the public in the run-up to the Iraq
war.
Bottom Line: If the Bush administration was lying about weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq, then so too were many leading Democrats.
The following is a list of statements made by prominent Democrats on Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction program:
Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.)
"According to the CIA's report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree that Iraq is
seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that Saddam Hussein wants to develop nuclear weapons."
Congressional Record, October 9, 2002
Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.)
"In the four years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam
Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear
program. ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage
biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Congressional Record, October 10, 2002
Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.)
"[It] is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons,
and his present and potential future support for terrorist acts and organizations, that make him a terrible danger to the
people to the United States."
Congressional Record, October 10, 2002
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.)
"We must eliminate that [potential nuclear] threat now before it is too late. But
that isn't just a future threat. Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose real threats to America
today, tomorrow. ... [He] is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring
these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East. He could make these weapons available to
many terrorist groups, third parties, which have contact with his government. Those groups, in turn, could bring those weapons
into the United States and unleash a devastating attack against our citizens. I fear that greatly."
Congressional Record, October 10, 2002
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.)
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons
of mass destruction.”
Remarks at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, October 27,
2002
Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.)
"There is no question that Iraq possesses biological and chemical weapons and that
he seeks to acquire additional weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. That is not in debate. I also agree
with President Bush that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must be disarmed, to quote President Bush directly."
Congressional Record , October 8, 2002
President Bill Clinton
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more of the very
kind of threat Iraq poses now - a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists,
drug traffickers, or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed. If we fail to respond today, Saddam, and
all those who would follow in his footsteps, will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity,
even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council, and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction
program."
Remarks at the Pentagon , February 17, 1998
"[L]et's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or
we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction
and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he
will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more
to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal. And I think
every one of you who has really worked on this for any length of time, believes that, too."
Remarks at the Pentagon, February 17, 1998
"Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With
Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them, not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian
troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of
Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish
civilians in Northern Iraq. The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."
Remarks at the White House , December 16, 1998
Vice President Al Gore
"[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles,
chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He's already demonstrated a willingness
to use these weapons; he poison gassed his own people. He used poison gas and other weapons of mass destruction against his
neighbors. This man has no compunctions about killing lots and lots of people."
Larry King Live, December 16, 1998
"Remember, Peter, this is a man who has used poison gas on his own people and on
his neighbors repeatedly. He's trying to get ballistic missiles, nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons. He could
be a mass murderer of the first order of magnitude. We are not going to allow that to happen."
ABC News’ "Special Report,” December 16, 1998
"We know that [Saddam] has stored away secret supplies of biological weapons and
chemical weapons throughout his Country."
Remarks to the Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, Calif., September
23, 2002
Secretary Of State Madelyn Albright
"Countering terror is one aspect of our struggle to maintain international security
and peace. Limiting the dangers posed by weapons of mass destruction is a second. Saddam Hussein's Iraq encompasses both of
these challenges.”
Remarks at the American Legion Convention, New Orleans, La., August 9, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [America], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face. And it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm. In discussing Iraq,
we begin by knowing that Saddam Hussein, unlike any other leader, has used weapons of mass destruction even against his own
people."
CNN "Showdown With Iraq: International Town Meeting," February 18, 1998
Defense Secretary William Cohen
Cohen appeared on ABC’s "This Week” in 1997 to talk about Saddam’s
weapons of mass destruction. To illustrate the danger, he brought a five-pound bag of sugar.
Cohen: It’s important when we talk about weapons of mass destruction
that we translate that into something that the American people, and hopefully, the world community can understand. If you
take a five pound bag of sugar and accept – call this anthrax (holding up a 5-pound bag of table sugar). This amount
of anthrax could be spread over a city – let’s say the size of Washington. It could destroy at least half the
population of that city. If you had even more amounts ...
One of the things we found with anthrax is that one breath and you are likely to
face death within five days. One small particle of anthrax could produce death within five days.
VX is a nerve agent. One drop from this particular thimble as such – one
single drop will kill you within a few minutes.
Cokie Roberts: Would you put that bag down please.
Cohen: Now I want to point out – I will spill it on the table –
point out that he has had enormous amounts and I’d like to go to some of the lies that have been told about this, because
originally, if we could look at this particular chart, the original declaration of Iraq, he said he had small quantities of
nerve agent for research. We found almost four tons of VX – that little vial I just showed you – four tons of
it.
"This Week” on ABC, November 16, 1997
|
Mitt Romney's leading
V.P. candidate, Governor Chris Christie turns his back on a disabled vet's charges of attorney ethics violations against
one of Christie's lawyer friends. Chris Christie is delaying a call for a transparent investigation for a missing
Superior Court transcript as well as fraud and perjury charges surrounding New Jersey Supreme Court Official Robert Correale
and his powerful and influential, former law firm, Maynard & Truland.
Please call
Governor Chris Christie's office at 609-292-6000 and state that John "Jack" Cunningham's allegations deserve
a 'honest' New Jersey State investigation. Please pass this request for calling Governor Chris Christie to ALL your families and friends 'on and off' the
internet. It's about time, New Jersey's state government faced this Cover-up.
"A man good enough to shed his blood
for his country, is good enough to receive a square deal afterwards . . ." -- Theodore Roosevelt
"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall
be directly proportional to how they perceive veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation."
Help give America's PTSD vets a stronger voice. Please join our Facebook Cause.
We have over 17,000 members. PTSD disabled vets should be protected under the Federal Americans with Disability
Act?
CAP 2-2-2 November 1970
webmaster, disabled Vietnam vet
Jack Cunningham, back row, 2nd from right
|
PLEASE PRESS THE ABOVE PlCTURE |
Please press the above link to read the story.
Government corruption, which is quite
obvious in this case, is the vilest form of governmental abuse of power. As a retired police officer, this case violates every
tenet that I placed my life on the line for every day for in order to uphold our constitution. Shame on New Jersey. Your state's reputation precedes
you, and this case confirms why. Thomas Ross
After learning the facts
about the above issue, please call Congressman Scott Garrett's office and ask Dana Coates, if she will be answering Jack
Cunningham's communications on this issue. Her number is 973 300 2000 973 300 2000 .
| Webmaster
Jack Cunningham Sussex, NJ |

|
| Webmaster
Jack Cunningham Sussex, NJ |
JOIN
FACEBOOK CAUSES
Help a Disabled Vet Get An Investigation Started Against Corrupt Attorney Robert Correale
Details
and Evidence below
Navy Petty Officer Mike Monsoor
WHY WASN'T
THIS ON THE FRONT PAGE NEWS?
(AP Photo/David Guttenfelder, FILE)
A real David and Goliath story
Eight year corruption battle against his State Government may finally come to light...
Above the Law
Disabled vet and webmaster battles 8 years to
bring them to justice.
When does a Superior Court transcript
go missing, before it could be typed?
When a state Supreme Court official is
being tied for legal Malpractice.
This same
Supreme Court Official Commits Perjury to Supreme Court (Evidence)
(See if
you can recognize the perjury)

Washington, Hamilton and LaFayette on the Green at Morristown,
New Jersey
Here's a picture of a 260 mountain lion.
Full picture and story at the next link.
.
Read the
story behind this picture and see a larger picture copy at this link.
....
In 2007, we had near 6,700,000
hits against our two websites. In 2008, we had 12,976,779. Thanks for the visits.
http://www.CapVeterans.com
http://www.Americans-Working-Together.com
.
A group of corrupt lawyers and those, who have
protected them for eight (8) years, may finally get Justice.
A team of state legislators are investigating my corruption and cover-up allegations within the
state’s Supreme Court and Superior Court systems. Their initial letters of inquiry can be found at:
http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id138.html
Thank
you, everyone, who took an interest and supported me and my family...
.
Is America turning her back on her veterans?
.
Not all corrupt lawyers get tried for ethics violations
For years, Vice
Chairman of Attorney Ethics Robert Correale, Esq. judged other attorneys in
his state, yet he gets away with these same crimes. He shouldn't be above the same laws that he enforced on others
in his profession. Now, this same corrupt state official is an assistant District Attorney judging private citizens in the state. Evidence:
http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id73.html
| |